Savage Single Shot Firearms > Savage 219 Single Shot Rifles

another 30-30

<< < (2/2)

t4halo:
Garnett, I do reload but am waiting to get a mold for 30 cal rounds.  I bet the little Savage would really like cast bullets.. 

I have something that might be interesting to you.  My 28ga has a shorter lop than any other 220 I own and it appears to be factory.  It almost looks like it was special ordered for a youth.  I'll post some pictures tomorrow.

Got the book today and have read about 30 pages..  very interesting stuff.  Great work.

Tony

Garnett:
Tony, Thanks for your input.  I would like to see a picture.  Also, if you will remove the butt plate and look to see if the assembly numbers in front of the barrel lug and inside the top left frame wall are stamped in the wood there, it would be a good indication that it is original factrory lop.  I look forward to your pictures.  Best wishes, Garnett

Mike Armstrong:
Tony, after reading your first post on this thread, I have a comment on "single shot issues." 

Having hunted birds and small game a lot in the forested East, I finally decided that out there anything other than a single shot was basically just extra cost, extra weight, extra wasted ammo, and "keepin' up with the Joneses"!  With ruffed grouse and woodcock, you usually only get one practical shot.  I carried a double for many years and can't remember a single time when I missed with the first barrel and connected with the second. 

Now, I'm NOT the world's best wingshot.  But I think the problem--especially with ruffed grouse and woodcock-- is that what you get is ONE feasible shot, and often not even that.   The second is usually just a "Hail Mary," or "sprayin' and prayin".   Trims the woods a little but nothing else.

So why carry two barrels?  I finally started carrying just my 20 guage 220SC (with the Savage Choke opened wide open)  and left the doubles home for clays and hunting out-of-state for pheasants, huns, and quail, where the second shot is useful.  My score on grouse and woodcock didn't change, and the only time I ever wished for a double was when I bumped a creek or beaver pond to see if there were any ducks in it.  Since most such places are frozen solid most of the upland season, that was only a marginal sacrifice.  And I sure liked the light weight of that 220 compared even to my double Beretta 20!  And because it is hammerless and has a tang safety, you can switch freely between a 220 and a single trigger double without any confusion or transition.

My only regret about the 220 is that they don't make 'em any more!  I think your "issues" are actually "virtues."

Mike Armstrong

Garnett:
Mike, I am not a hunter so I really have no experience with your post.  However, I have long felt that a single shot was enough gun to carry as it should make you be more sure of your shot. The M219/220 Savages are a slim, light weight, and very pleasing to look at gun.  I also feel if you miss the first shot.....you don't really deserve a second shot at the same critter. :-)   As an example....I was fortunate many years ago to hunt with an older friend at work.  All I had was a Parker double.  He had a Browning 5 shot auto.  If we flushed a covey of quail, I shot once, maybe twice if a second bird was close, but he emptied his gun every time.  I think we had a law limiting magazine capacity, but not sure his gun had the wooden plug. :-(  I don't object to hunting, but as long as Winn-Dixie has a meat and fish market, I won't be hunting my own! :-)

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version