Author Topic: Differences between the Savage 219 and Savage 24 frames  (Read 254 times)

The Ry Guy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Differences between the Savage 219 and Savage 24 frames
« on: November 27, 2024, 02:32:15 PM »
Out of curiosity more than anything, did Savage use the same material (looks to be cast on my 219 in 30-30) and similar design (hinge pin diameter, barrel locking lug etc.) for making the receivers for both the 219 and Model 24?They look similar to me in pictures, but I've never held a Model 24 to compare to my 219.

Curious because I see that the 24 could be had in .223 and that's a fairly high pressure round, you'd think it'd be hard on a cast frame such as these single shots are.

Thoughts anyone?

Garnett

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1081
Re: Differences between the Savage 219 and Savage 24 frames
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2024, 02:50:49 PM »
I can’t be helpful with your questions.  I only have one Model 24 and the only experience I have had with it, was to verify that the very rare 9 mm Rim Fire Shot cartridge barrel would fit on the action.  It was a perfect fit.  These barrels were later rifled and chambered for the .357 Magnum cartridge.  At the time I was fitting the barrel to the M24, I did not think to see if the newly chambered .357 round would fire in the M24.  Most likely not, since it was originally chambered for the R.F. Round.

Yes, the receivers were cast as you can tell when looking at the internal parts of the action.  Also, the barrel lugs were cast as part of the barrel.  I show a picture of an unfinished casting in my book. 

Hopefully someone else can help with your questions.  Best wishes,. Garnett